Monthly Archives: February 2020

The World That I Envision

February 17, 2020

Culture and Society

The year is 2020. I question how far we have actually evolved as creatures on this planet. Certainly, we can travel to outer space and fly, but is this as good as it gets? How do we determine what that “good” is?

As I see it, we exist far away from who we could become, and these are two issues that stand at the core of what holds us back:

  • We constantly repeat a history of greed and colonialism.
  • We have not learned how to innovate without harming our natural environment.

Whether by force or economic means, countries impose control and dominion over others just as they have in the past. Poor neighborhoods with affordable housing are being consumed by gentrification and grubby realtors. We are polluting our air and water, and our oceans have become dumping grounds for plastic that will take thousands of years to biodegrade. Entire generations of people are obsessed with their cell phones and social media. Multi-national corporations such as every oil and gas company, Apple, and Google use their expansive influence and unlimited resources to further their own agendas.

Perhaps it’s not all bad because there are genuinely decent and kind people in the world, but is that enough?

I have some ideas for a different future—one in which human civilization thrives harmoniously with the physical environment and compassion supersedes greed as an inherent motivator.

I envision a world in which . . .

  • All societies take the time to understand and celebrate the values of their indigenous roots.

    Long before the industrial age, indigenous communities thrived all over the world by carefully and thoughtfully utilizing the vast natural resources of our planet. They planted their own food and went on fishing and hunting expeditions. They lived in smaller, sustainable communities and were true stewards of the land and its resources. Sure, they never knew the pleasures of indoor plumbing and air conditioning, but they clearly were fine without any of those modern amenities. It would be worthwhile to study and understand how these communities achieved so much with so much less than we have now.

  • We would get rid of cars.

    The invention of the automobile changed the trajectory of our modern lives. While I am grateful that it eliminated the use of cruel horse-drawn carriages, it created a Mount Everest-sized mountain of other problems. Instead of the more sustainable system of trains and railways that America and many other countries were using, the whole world switched to using cars which needed paved roads everywhere, hundreds of thousands of miles of highways in constant need of expensive upkeep/repairs, countless acres of land used for parking lots, air pollution due to smog from cars, landfills with millions of old and unused vehicles, daily car accidents all over the world that have killed and/or injured thousands upon thousands of people, and lastly, billions of dollars we all spend on gas, oil changes, tires, insurance, and so much more.

    Imagine what we could do with all of that land that we need for parking and highways? More green spaces? Schools? Playgrounds? Imagine how much money you could save not having to pay for a car? The possibilities are endless. We have sacrificed too much to have this convenience. Let’s bring back our trains and railways everywhere.

  • All municipalities would impose strict limits on housing rental rates.

    The concept of affordable housing is becoming more of a myth in virtually every developed country in the world. Rents increase, and this creates a flood of new problems. Poor communities (mostly immigrants and people of color) are priced out of their homes and displaced. Property values increase so much that only the absurdly wealthy can live comfortably in a good area (I’m looking at you San Francisco). Class lines become more clearly defined along racial lines. The creative class of artists (musicians, writers, visual artists) have to relocate, and this sucks the vibrancy and life out of a community.

    So, what if we had reasonable limits on what people could charge for rent? It would be a step forward toward creating a more equitable housing market that is sustainable for the long term. Families who need homes take care of their neighborhoods across several generations. Corporations that buy out entire neighborhoods only want the money.

I could go on endlessly, but these are just some of the ideas I have for a world that I envision. I write all of this to plant these ideas into the collective awareness of what we know.

Let’s use our powerful imaginations and ingenuity to do right by our planet and our future generations of humans. Our greed may only lead us to our demise, but compassion for all things can unlock limitless possibilities.


Do Not Get Your News From Social Media

February 9, 2020

Culture and Society

During the last presidential election cycle here in the United States, it has been confirmed by several reputable news sources and government agencies that Russia tampered with our election. I do not know the full extent to which they did this, but one of the more notable ways was through social media.

This sounds like it came out of an espionage novel, but the truth can be as nefarious as fiction. Russian operatives created fake news sites and blasted Facebook and Twitter with stories that were aimed to dis-inform the general public with slightly skewed or blatantly false information. These stories and headlines were often shared and discussed by users of social media, and with enough time and replication, the perspectives of millions of people were influenced.

Now in 2020, we are approaching the apex of another presidential election cycle. If we do not learn from our mistakes of the past, we are woefully doomed to repeat them.

I have taken the following simple steps to avoid reading news on social media (These apply toward whichever poison you prefer be it Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram).

  • Limit time spent on social media.

    This is the first line of defense if you know in your soul that you cannot live without being on sites like Twitter and Instagram. The less time you spend on these sites, the smaller the likelihood that you will click on the sensational headlines that your friends share. It’s not likely that your friends are vetting the sources of these stories or the websites they came from, however benign your friends may be.

    Avoiding social media as much as possible will significantly minimize the possibility of disinformation spreading to your brain. Try limiting use to a specific time of day for only an hour. Leave your phone somewhere hard to reach. Do whatever it takes. It’s also likely that you’ll find something better to do with your time.

  • Be discerning about what you click and read on social media

    It’s one thing to read and comment on a personal story or anecdote that a friend shares. It is another thing entirely to click on the news links people display. Not only can these websites provide false or misleading information, but they can also have malware that can get into your computer. (Again, this sounds crazy, but the technology exists.) You do not have to click on any news headlines at all, but if you have to, proceed with caution and a questioning disposition.

    I find it much more useful to connect with friends about their lives than to discuss political opinions and news. That is the filter that I use to navigate through my feeds.

  • Use legitimate sources outside of social media to get your news.

    As the previous election demonstrates, the algorithms and technology behind social media cannot be trusted. When I disengage from the addictive cult fashioned by Mark Zuckerburg and other powers that be, I seek out actual news sites for detailed information and varying perspectives. This sounds like more effort, but that’s a small price to pay to avoid the mind control that social media seems to be intent on weaponizing.

Incidentally, here is a list of news sites that I like to frequent. Have a look if you are curious, and to make it more convenient, create a folder on your web browser’s “Favorites” list to house them all for easy access. (If you do not like any of these, proceed with caution and skepticism to find others.)

This year’s presidential election will be fraught with drama and noisy divisiveness. It will be more important than ever to be clearheaded and focused on the platforms of different candidates and how you feel about them.

Stay engaged and informed, and please, do not get your news from social media.


The Colonialism of Religion

February 3, 2020

Culture and Society

Across the history of humanity, religion has been a powerful and all-encompassing force. I have some thoughts I want to share about the nature of formalized religion both historically and in the modern day, but before I dive deeper into this post, I have a few details to establish.

  • Like most of my family, I was born and raised in the Roman Catholic Church. I received the sacraments of baptism, Holy Communion, and Confirmation under the auspices of this Christian religion.
  • I grew up on an island in the South Pacific going to Catholic mass every Sunday morning. I served as an altar boy and graduated from a Catholic high school.
  • As an adult, I personally do not ascribe to any particular formal or established religion. I follow a private set of personal spiritual beliefs that I keep all to myself.

Now here are some technical points:

  • According to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, the word “colonialism” is defined as “control by one power over a dependent area or people.” It is also known historically by the word “imperialism.”
  • Examples of colonialism include the establishing of the 13 colonies by Great Britain in the New World, France taking over a small group of islands in the South Pacific now known as French Polynesia, Germany taking over the Samoan islands, and Spain claiming the islands of the Philippines (my original home country). Lands and resources of indigenous people all over the world were forcefully taken away by powerful European countries.
  • Colonialism still exists today in many different forms.

Lastly, I have nothing against the healing powers, the compassion, and deep spiritual connections that people experience through their religious practices. These can be rich, tender, and deeply fulfilling components of a person’s life.

What I have a problem with is the part of organized religion that needs to survive and grow by imposing its beliefs on everyone it can get its hands on. There are thousands, if not millions, of missionaries all over the world preaching the glory of Christ and the benefits of “being saved.”

I understand that people can be so passionate about their beliefs that they genuinely want to share the joy of their spiritual experiences, but often enough, this sharing occurs in mission trips in foreign, third-world countries in which people do not have the means and education to advocate for themselves. Missionaries proselytize toward the sick and impoverished and those who are vulnerable. In some ways, they are getting much-needed attention and assistance from these missionaries, but in a broader sense, is it possible that they are being forced to believe in something outside of their own history and native traditions? Is this an example of a powerful religion forcing its hand upon the vulnerable?

From a deeper perspective, religiosity and militarism have often been cozy bedfellows. The former has often been the cause of the latter. Religion has often been the rationalization for violent acts all over the world (such as the conflicts in the Middle East), and it should come as no surprise that it has also been the justification for imperialist expansion. One harrowing example is the concept of manifest destiny, which proclaimed that the United States was given the divine right by “Providence” to expand its territories across the continent. This ideology was used to empower the forceful US acquisition of vast lands and territories for its own purposes.

Clearly, religion can be a dangerous and formidable device. It has wielded its powers to the furthest reaches of our planet.

When I was young and lived on a small island in the South Pacific, I noticed something strange about the local villages in the area.

They all had churches, and everyone went to church.

This is certainly not unusual in and of itself, but I began to question why Catholicism and the Mormon church had become so ubiquitous that they were thriving in a remote island thousands of miles away from anything.

Did a bunch of European missionaries arrive on this island to claim this land and “enlighten” the local savages? Were they saying our “God” is better than your gods and all of your native traditions? Did these ambassadors of religion do all of this as a way to extend their influence and power all over the world?

Simply put, yes.

This brings to mind a question that has haunted me for a long time.

Why isn’t there an EXCHANGE of ideas and beliefs rather than the obliteration of one spiritual practice over another?

Did these missionaries ever think to simply have a discussion about their different spiritual traditions? Could it have been possible that the rituals and traditions of indigenous people were just as rich, meaningful, and powerful?

Simply put, in the colonialist mindset, no.

As an islander, I often wondered what spiritual practices existed in our villages before European Christianity came and took over everything. There was never any mention of it when I attended school. I wondered about the purity and uniqueness of what might have existed—that a spiritual life can be cultivated by a small group of people through their own ideas and experiences. The notion that an indigenous people can have their own independent spiritual lives is a thing of beauty.

Over the last few decades, my childhood island home has built numerous parochial schools and huge church buildings that no tropical hurricanes and tsunamis can take down.

Religious colonialism has made its mark all over the world, and that’s just how it is.

Whenever someone tells me that they are about to go on a mission trip, I honestly cringe at the thought. I want to tell them that I am happy for their personal spiritual growth, but is it absolutely necessary to force it onto other people? I often want to encourage them to also have discussions and exchanges about the local, indigenous spiritual truths that exist in those areas that they visit.

Better yet, what if they just went to help them with their needs without any of the proselytizing?

Under that scenario, these missions would become an act of pure kindness and compassion with no expectation of getting anything in return and without imposing a foreign (and largely European) religious ideology.

Would that be so bad?

Simply put, no.